Sustainability Of The Single Spine Pay Policy
Perhaps the greatest news that emerged from the National Forum on the
sustainability of the Single Spine Pay Policy in Ho was the fact that
government had no intention to scrap the policy which to all intent and
purposes had brought some sanity in the administration of public sector
pay. President Mahama who gave the keynote address at the opening of
the two day forum made it emphatic that government intends to go along
with the policy and therefore charged the Fair Wages and Salaries
Commission and the Management Development and Productivity Institute to
collaborate with stakeholders to undertake a market survey for effective
implementation of the nagging issue of market premium.
The Single
Spine Pay Policy was initiated by the erstwhile Kufuor Administration
to help minimise disparities and distortions that might have hitherto
bedeviled the Public Service Salary administration system. In effect
the policy was meant to attract, retain and motivate public sector
workers to enhance effectiveness in service delivery for improved
productivity. In recent times however, implementation of the policy has
encountered some challenges including labour unrests.
Salaries and
wages have sky-rocketed thereby spiralling the National Wage Bill. In
the 2013 Budget it was projected that the country's GDP base will expand
and therefore the Public Sector Wage Bill as a component of GDP will
decline serving as a balancing act. While that argument remains true,
all things being equal, the first quarter of 2013 was hit by severe
energy crisis which have adversely impacted on GDP growth.
Recently the
IMF cautioned that Ghana's growing wage bill if untamed will increase
the country's debt to levels that pose a risk to its transformation
agenda. According to the IMF, Ghana's wage bill rose by 47 percent last
year following the implementation of the Single Spine which have seen
some salaries being doubled. It is good government has introduced some
new taxes and expanded the tax net to raise more revenue to pay
recurrent expenditure and for development. Also subsidies on petroleum
products are being removed whilst adjustments are being made in the
tariffs of basic utilities to help shore up government finances. The
TUC in its contribution at the National Forum in Ho urged government to
take steps to reduce what it described as inefficiencies, wastage and
corruption in the public sector payment regime. According to the
Secretary General, the phenomenon of ghost names continues to plague the
payroll system despite attempts to bio-metrically verify and capture
workers and pensioners.
The Fair Wages and Salaries Commission must do
well to iron out all disagreements between it and identifiable Labour
Unions and Association. There is the need for circumspection in order
not to de-motivate public sector workers. All pay scales must be
integrated to ensure uniformity and fairness. The 18 point communique
that was issued after the forum is quite reassuring and must be
seriously considered if the Single Spine Pay Policy is to be sustained.
Pay must be linked to work and productivity must be the basis for
compensation. Workers owe it a responsibility to justify the huge
salaries that they are earning under the Single Spine.
As suggested,
Article 71 office holders whose remuneration people are pointing fingers
at must be quickly rolled on to the Single Spine to ensure equity. It
is worth noting the recommendation that the social partners adhere to
the guidelines for the determination of market premiums under the
policy and that a labour sector survey start with the health and
education sectors and this must be completed by the end of 2013.
Salaries from these sectors are truly impacting and must be carefully
looked at. Another suggestion tabled at the forum which can be
considered is the need to wean State institutions with the capacity to
be self-financing off government subvention.
Some State institutions
which have the capacity must be company structured and made
profit-oriented. Indeed the Ho Forum on Single Spine sustainability is
well intentioned and similar forums must be organised to cover other
areas of national interest. Ideas and resolutions passed at the forum
should be implemented with despatch and must not be allowed to suffer
the fate of similar laudable national fora. As is said we cannot cut
our nose to spite our face.
BY JUSTICE MINGLE, A JOURNALIST
Comments
Post a Comment